I was reading a VP discussion over at Ezra Klein's American Prospect blog and a commenter named "Mike B" made a very astute point about the prospect of choosing Sen. Evan Bayh as veep:
I think the veep choice is going to be a signal for how Obama feels about his own chances. If it's Bayh--the safest, blandest, least interesting choice possible, and someone who isn't a natural fit with his message or style--he's terrified that the race doesn't favor him. It's the kind of dumb decision made out of fear instead of rationality, and it's at the root of the problems that have been screwing up our party for decades.
I think this is exactly right. To be sure, as the pundits and political junkies discuss Barack Obama's VP options, I just wanted to offer some (unsolicited) advice to the junior senator from Illinois: Trust your instincts.
What I mean by this is that Obama should choose the person who he believes in and who he personally feels would make a good leader for this country--and then let the chips fall where they may. If this person is from a state with only a few electoral college votes, or a state that is guaranteed to go to the Republicans in the fall, or both, it doesn't matter.
Picking someone like Sen. Bayh as VP would send a clear message to voters that Obama is doing all of this to get himself into the White House, not to effect any real or meaningful change. It would be a purely cynical move and I think voters would sense this.
Obama should instead choose someone who would enable him to send this signal to the voters: "I believe in my message and I have a good argument to make. My running-mate reinforces this argument and that's why I think he/she would make a great leader if something were to happen to me." This is what motivates people to get out and vote.
Let's use someone like Gov. Brian Schweitzer of Montana as an example. Since he is from a state with only 3 electoral college votes that is almost certain to go to McCain in November, choosing him would send a message to the voters that this choice was made not because Obama hoped he could carry a particular state, but because he actually believes in Schweitzer's leadership abilities. I think voters would definitely sense this, and Obama's message of change would be strengthened and reinforced.
Anyway, I've made my case and I'm going to open it up to commenters: Agree? Disagree? Am I reading too much into the VP decision? To quote Bill O'Reilly: What say you?
|
|
|
Permalink :: 29 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.